Tokyo Kills Me: Fall, 2017. Snapshots from daily life in The Big Sushi.
Tokyo Kills Me: Fall, 2017. Snapshots from daily life in The Big Sushi.
A companion piece to yesterday’s post, ‘What I Most Like about Living in Japan’
As for disadvantages, I suppose it depends on where you start from, on what you’re comparing it to (“disadvantages” is inherently a comparative term)
So, in the interests of context and point of view, I’ll say that I grew up and was educated in Canada, and came to Japan on a three-year adventure which 20 years later has turned into a way of life
Okay, offhand the following disadvantages come to mind:
Read the rest of the post at What I Don’t Like about Living in Japan
Today the question came up on Quora, “What do you like most about Japan?” Maybe it’s the broadness of the question, or the fact that I have a tone of work to do these days, but the query launched me on an hour-long bout of creative procrastination, which has resulted in (lightly edited) following answer:
I left for a three-year overseas adventure before returning to start my next adventure, but “life happens” as they say… Herewith, a partial list of what has kept me in Japan for nigh-on 20 years:
Back in September, I started a weekly series of blogs about a Tokyo expat’s view of all the “sabre-rattling,” the “war of words” currently being fought between Trump and Kim Jong-un. I’ve published four weekly blogs so far, “Dotard and Little Rocket Man in Tokyo: an expat view” and gathered them together in a publication: Nuclear Nightmares over Tokyo: an expat’s view of the apocalypse to come,’ at https://medium.com/nuclear-nightmares-over-tokyo. Unfortunately, with the North Koreans continuing to pursue missile and nuclear warhead technology and the Americans ramping up the rhetoric, it looks like there will be more to blog… stay tuned!
Despite all the recent nuclear bomb tests and missile launches in North Korea, including a few flyovers of my adopted home Japan, our rural suburb in west Tokyo seemed safely on the sidelines of the current nuclear missile crisis in North Korea. After all, I figured, with nearly 80,000 South Korean and US troops to face on the other side of the DMZ, Kim Jong-un had enough on his plate without worrying about Japan, a country so shell-shocked by the horrors of war that eighty years later its constitution still prohibits a standing army.*
Besides, to be mercenary about it, and with apologies in advance to the Chammoros, if anyone off the Korean peninsula might be in Pyongyang’s bombsights, wouldn’t it be Guam? After all, “America’s aircraft carrier in the Pacific” is home base to the B1 Lancer bombers which recently flew above the DMZ — though still in international airspace — and prompted the threat that North Korea would shoot down American bombers.
In the algorithm of risk vs. reward which every expat calculates in times of crisis, I simply could not see the danger of a nuclear — or biological or chemical — attack near Tokyo outweighing the rewards of the life that R., my wife, and I have been lucky enough to build for ourselves in Tokyo.
So it naturally came as a bit of a surprise in mid September, when a North Korean state agency threatened to use nuclear weapons to “sink” Japan. I mean, why would Kim Jong-Un aim one of his maybe 60 nuclear weapons at us?
Then I learned a couple of facts which has changed the metric.
First, there are 50,000 American forces members in Japan, well within strike range of Pyongyang and thus likely of interest to the DPRK military leadership. And, of the 23 American military facilities in Japan, seven are in or near Tokyo, including Yokota Air Base and the Yokosuka Naval Base. Yokota, the home for the headquarters of United States Forces Japan, is in Fussa, western Tokyo — R. and I pass on our way to the mountains. Yokosuka, at the mouth of Tokyo Bay, is home port to entire Seventh Fleet, including the supercarrier USS Ronald Reagan, which returns to the Korean peninsula in October.
In other words, there are significant military targets within Tokyo. For a lesson in morbid urban geography, the Nukemap website can approximate casualties and fatalities for variables such as yield size, airburst or surface detonation, and wind direction. According to the site, and depending on wind direction, our neighbourhood in west Tokyo could well be in the fallout zone of a 250-kiloton hydrogen bomb, the same size as the bomb tested in mid-September — up to 17 times the size of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.
Second, there is a historic animosity between Japan and North Korea; indeed, the very founding of North Korea and the current dynasty is rooted in resistance to the Japanese occupation of the peninsula in the first third of the 20th century. As I learned in a recent Newsweek feature by Samuel Earle, the origin myth of North Korea’s current dynasty is inextricably linked to Kim Il-Sung’s resistance to the Japanese occupation of Korea. So if Kim Jong-un were to “sink” Japan as he has recently threatened to do, he would simply be fulfilling the war against Japan fought by his grandfather almost 100 years ago.
So, for the moment, we here in Japan perhaps more than in most other countries must rely on the better angels of Donald Trump and Kim Jong-un’s natures to not blow us up.
But are they paying attention? Maybe I should tweet this…
Samuel Earle, North Korea vs. Japan: A Historic and Hateful Rivalry That Now Threatens the World from Newsweek, reprinted on Yahoo News
Daily snaps and photo walks from life in the GTA (Greater Tokyo Area) in the summer of 2017. Taken by a long-term expat (20th year in Japan!) who lives in the city but loves to explore the surrounding countryside. Part of an ongoing series, Tokyo Kills Me.
Until recently, I considered being in Tokyo a sideline seat to the North Korea nuclear crisis. After all, I rationalized, why would Kim Jong-un waste precious nuclear bombs on a symbolic target like Tokyo? Between the American and the South Korean militaries, weren’t there enough concerns on the Korean peninsula without having to look for targets further afield? And if the North Korean military command did turn their attention offshore, wouldn’t Guam be the most likely target (no offense to the Guamanians)?
Then, however, I learned a few things.
First, there are 50,000 American forces members in Japan, well within strike range of Pyongyang and thus of interest to the DPRK military leadership.
Second, America has some significant military hardware in the region. The USS Ronald Reagan, the aircraft “supercarrier” and flagship of the US Navy recently dispatched to the waters off North Korea, is permanently based in Yokuska at the mouth of Tokyo Bay.
Third, there is an historic animosity between Japan and North Korea; indeed, the very founding of North Korea and the current dynasty is rooted in resistance to the Japanese occupation of the peninsula in the first third of the 20th century. As I learned in a recent Newsweek Feature by Samuel Earle, the origin myth of North Korea’s current dynasty is inextricably linked to Kim Il-Sung’s resistance to the Japanese occupation of Korea. So if Kim Jong-un were to “sink” Japan as he has recently threatened to do, he would simply be fulfilling the war against Japan fought by his grandfather almost 100 years ago.
So, IS North Korea likely to directly attack Japan? Despite the recent escalation of words, with “Rocket Man” and “dotard” being flung across the Pacific, it still seems unlikely. A graver and more imminent concern, perhaps is North Korea’s threat to carry out an atmospheric explosion of a hydrogen bomb, the fallout from which could affect the entire region.
I will continue to post updates from ‘Einstein’s Monsters’ on Big Sushi, Little Fishes as long as there is interest. You can also read the full text of Einstein’s Monsters at https://medium.com/@aaronpaulson/einsteins-monsters-in-tokyo-an-expat-view-3c6fdaa44f1e